Say in the past 100 years, many people speak of academic certificates with convincing authority, have a mainly U.S. citizens, not the promotion of literature written in the belief that democratic socialism can not, and is virtually impossible in the human society to work. Most of these people, experts have been trained in the United States, weaned on the rich fruits of corporate capitalism and the doctrine of pragmatism advanced primarily through the efforts of Charles philosophicalSanders Peirce, William James, Chauncey Wright, Nicholas St. John Green and Oliver Wendell Holmes in the second half of the 19th Century and the first half of the 20th Century. These people, away from all academic thinkers, prosperous and highly affluent, engraved by private discussions, the discrete artificial philosophical predicates for a large part of public policy (federal and provincial legislation), directly to the advanced practices of corporate capitalism at the level at theycurrently exist and thrive around the globe, especially in the United States. These are primarily federal public policy that have made a very few American entrepreneurs and how many foreign investors extremely wealthy over the decades have been blinded by the said majority of American voters the generations, as prepared for the United States a global economic received performance. However, most of today's Americans, the vast majority of them are paid to work for wages and salariesCorporations and financial corporations in the 58 U.S. states, territories and possessions have no real knowledge and understanding of the practical philosophy of pragmatism, or the history of capitalist economic development in the United States, and that is very unfortunate.
While a majority of U.S. citizens are currently high school graduates (about 80 percent), far less than the majority are university graduates (about 28 percent in 2006), and information to young peoplelearn at school on Comparative Economic and U.S. political and economic history that is used up and carried into adulthood, conscious and a very tiny small component of what should be a grown-up full and comprehensive public education. But the citizens over twenty-five years who are without the benefits of a liberal college education are the many millions of hardworking, law-abiding men and women from the domestic workforce, to spend 40-or-moreHours per week earn money to give the essentials of life for themselves and their wives, husbands and children they could support. After most of these Americans deserve the state workers to earn a living, use them, what education they be as productive as it can have in their own sphere of influence. In essence, most of these people are not that with what happens in Washington, DC, in the provincial capitals, and in their respective counties and cities, as affectedas long as they are capable of the jobs with which they earn the money needed to obtain the necessary bills, such as paying the mortgage or rent, utilities, car payments, gasoline, health care, and the many other debts that the Use incurred credit. Even an unnecessary foreign war, waged by illegal presidential and congressional elections, duplicity, is often not enough to hire a majority of U.S. citizens into active opposition, if an economic status quo appears to exist. Untilfor the status quo, as is a minimum level of stability, maintained, with individuals and families have the income and the apparent freedom that provide the basic necessities of life, the media, newspapers, news magazines and network television programs are only tools for public release Events, not necessary for the dissemination of factual information necessary for the promulgation of the consultative democratic process.
The face of American capitalism has for manyGenerations have been skillfully painted by pragmatic economists and historians as the best working conditions apologetic financial system in the modern world. Even if a current 85 per cent of the working citizens (those who make less than 10 percent of the U.S. population) have very rich, did not succeed in the course of time had the basic necessities of life that many are still impoverished, strangely, stand up and cheer for the existing status quo. It's hard to believe, but for now,one of four people in New York City do not know where is the next meal. This is around 25 percent of the more than eight million people in the greatest city in America, and if they can not afford adequate food, I seriously doubt whether they can afford proper medical care. This statistic is proportionally the same for most U.S. cities with more than 2 million in the population. Currently is 98 percent of wealth in the United States is controlled by only 2 percent of the population. And this is ahard cold fact. This is basically, and shocking, about 4 million in number, the number of people who would fit in three cities the size of Seattle. With over 16 million U.S. citizens around the nation that can not currently afford any kind of medicine and medical care to alleviate their illness and pain, I think that a proper explanation of the American economic pragmatism, and the way it fits into corporate capitalism in a checkered military-industrial complex is also long overdue. When examinedand examined in the light of real history and facts, the development and expansion of American capitalism enough to choke a reasonable person.
In the early American republic, it was very comfortable and very pragmatic, promises to keep making many poor soldiers of the Continental Army, that the very wealthy founding fathers were not willing to. The definition of pragmatism, in and of itself, an illusory basis for the apparent bodydeliberative democracy. That is, the essence of pragmatism was originally embedded in the principle that the successful outcome of the productive enterprise justifies the means used, what could be. The men of the First Continental Congress were elected, of course, the richest men in the thirteen original British colonies that eventually the thirteen original states of the United States. These very wealthy people, Franklin, Mason, Henry Adams, Madison, Jefferson, andWashington proclaimed the Declaration of Independence, which asserted in the theory that all men are created equal, and that a nation should ensure that by law that every single person in this state has access to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Then, after the successful American Revolution, wrote most of these same men of the U.S. Constitution, which stated in its preamble that "the people) (or citizens of the newly founded United States justice, insure domesticTranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare (the people). "These were nice-sounding words, but hardly practical in the minds of the rich Framers.
Well, as I pointed out, were the very small number of representatives of the people, from the First Congress of the United States (1789), the richest and most influential men in the thirteen states. The first U.S. House of Representatives were wealthy land barons supposedly elected by the people, and theU.S. senators were from the wealthy land barons in the state legislatures appointed. They and some others in the new Republic were the controllers of the disposal to the population of the first Americans, which includes approximately 4 million people. So far less than 1 percent of the first U.S. census, the population had control of almost 100 percent of the available wealth. Nevertheless, one might ask, what incentives were offered to the fiduciary for the poor are illiterate, and semi-literate,Soldiers are recruited to fight the British in the war for American independence? Surprisingly, these zealous men were offered land and a little bit of money, by the First Continental Congress, for their willingness, their lives for the advanced principles of human freedom and dignity in the years of bloody American Revolution. So they fought and many died in the years before the final battle of Yorktown when British General Lord Cornwallis to surrenderGeorge Washington. However, later the first U.S. Congress recognized that the power of an economic system had to create in the fledgling nation for the express benefit every man, woman and child in the new republic to ensure the practical expression of the welfare , clause of the Preamble to the Constitution, and a way for every citizen the right to benefit from a pursuit of happiness offer. The democratic socialism would be warmly embraced, at this moment, one of whichmany of the wounded survivors of the American Revolution, and be lucky enough to damage in close combat to avoid. But she had not already promised one hundred hectares of land per soldier for military service? Well, on paper they had in the same way that contracts were created later and easily decimated the Indian tribes in the 19th Century broken. Still, the very rich, male owners of land, who were the elected representatives of thePeople in the First and Second Continental Congress realized that by developing common ground men the right to property and land, they may by a vote of losing control of the money in the new republic. Well, she violated with impunity, that the contract they previously did with the members of the Continental Army, and only allowed to post the current wealthy landowners voting in federal elections until around the year 1824. While the U.S. representative for thefirst three U.S. Congress were elected only white owner in most of the 13 original states, in accordance with federal requirements have been laws to protect the money and property barons of the country expected to control. The voting rights were generously extended, but the religious, ethnic and racial minorities, according to the rules of the few progressive states. But it must be remembered that the vast majority of federal and state lawmakers were in agreement regarding the ownershipand control of money and capital resources in the new republic.
To collect between 1789 and 1824, the first major companies and corporations, started by one (1 property) to the richest per cent of the population, and employ the first national labor force, by men, women were included, and the children, too that time in history were very grateful for the jobs and they paid the alms to feed their hungry families. Although about 45 percent of men who had fought in,Revolution decided to leave the boundaries of the new republic and yard in the western region beyond the national borders, poured the superiority of the former military and their families to the cities in search of viable employment. In the first 35 years, a generation of Americans lived together, worked and died, most of whom live in poverty, in a republic, which had originally promised to the paper that the general welfare of the people can be guaranteed. But the range from 1 percentof the population, that 99 percent of American wealth was controlled soon a solid 2 percent, which would rigorously check the next 185 years, 98 percent of the assets.
The practical lesson of pragmatism (deception was planned that ethical funds have been) for the purpose of the founding of the American Republic by rich powerful men who talk frankly in private, and the conviction that the people of the nation were basically stupid and could not hug to earn trustWealth and use them correctly. It was a plausibly deniable approach to creating and maintaining a capitalist status quo, directly contrary to the ideal joining forces for the physical welfare of the greater part of the population of concern. Simply put, the origin of pragmatism came directly from the idea that if you have the means or strength to achieve a desired end for the specific benefit of the few, is it ethically permissible to use this power to such an end form when it actuallyleads to a deterioration of many.
Democratic socialism in its pure form is essentially the opposite of the use of pragmatism in the course of economic development for a nation-state. It is more due to an idealism that is feasible if a common desire is predicated implemented the majority of a population of people by those with the power to make laws applicable law. Harry S. Truman declared the government's role quite well in the second volume of his memoirs when he said,"The government is for the purpose of winning the good cause." Democratic socialism does not mean that developing the ability to possess and to use resources, people would be eliminated on the federal legislation. On the contrary, had more of this particular heuristic approach to meeting the basic human needs of an expanding population on the argument that working people do, you should invest a wealthy capitalist, and as such would benefit from the foundation of their workthe capitalist profit. For if the capitalist is well accommodated, provided the best food and clothing, offering state-of-the-art transportation, and enjoys the best medical care available from the profits derived from the work of its employees, why employees do not deserve the same basic human rights and dignity in their correct ratio? That is, if promoting the general welfare of the citizens of the Republic, the constitutional commission, a result of just law.
Today,just like in the year 1825, the American capitalists who employ produce a large number of people purchasable consumer, industrial, and military products, continually seek practical ways to increase their profits through the use of existing laws to their employees legal minimum wages, wages , salaries, and benefits. In this way maximize capitalist profits and dividends. To maintain such an unethical, quasi-legal status quo in a republic, ruled by the alleged constitutionalLaw, the public laws of the federal and state legislatures will be passed on as a pragmatic, to invest projected to achieve a desired result, as the ultimate goal is a capitalist and to reinvest in order to generate obscene profits exorbitant. Ask, however, a wealthy capitalist and prosperous as federal and state politicians, if they are pragmatists at heart (assuming that the end results justify the means used to obtain them), so they are all with a fierce response, butLaughter. And fight in the last 185 years, a majority of the American population, the poor and middle class who have believed in this demanding answers.
In the lead rule, because such a successful application of pragmatism to a population of gullible people to be convinced that something is actually harmful to their well-being is in their favor. This is achieved through a consistent barrage covered, over time, more persuasive propaganda, with the existing media,serves to appease the masses. The best example that I can use in order to illustrate this point is the rise of Adolf Hitler and the Nazi regime to power in Weimar Germany over a relatively short period of less than ten years. In this period, a freedom-loving people of the civilized man was convinced that a fascist political system bent on the eradication of a race and religion of people, and is about the military dominance of the free world in their best interest. If Iright, "Time magazine boldly Adolf Hitler awarded the honor of" Man of the Year "in 1939. Even the inimitable Charles A. Lindbergh was a follower of Hitler, like many other prominent Americans, including the wealthy banker's grandfather Prescott Bush, George W. Bush 's.
The refinement of the practical systematic pragmatism in the late 19 Century, was the declared goal of such men as Charles S. Peirce. Through philosophical reflection on the Mexican War of 1848 and the finding that theManifest Destiny by President James Polk was realized only through the illicit but effective use of military force to preserve the country now as the American southwest, known as Pragmatism Peirce introduced effective means of achieving ethical future political and economic goals. Power law was to him a suitably effective aphorism in Approves the use of state power to achieve the best for a few. But the farce of pragmatism went a little bit deeper. In a popularMovie "Dave" who in the early 1990s, actor Kevin Kline as a presidential candidate by a conniving twin, is Chief of Staff of the White House staff, which take the place of a disability president, Dave finally recognizes what he's doing wrong and attempts to make directly against the will of the pragmatic chief of staff. In response, quips the chief of staff, played by Frank Langella, "I'll kill him. I could kill a hundred ordinary people." This film reflects the development of pragmatismthe point where the deaths of thousands have "ordinary" people to justify the creation and result of the capitalist world economy, to be accepted as a fine run by an American public duped. Today the American people is
The U.S. government, especially the institutions of the U.S. executive branch is a farce, the American public said that the tragic massacre in New York City, on 11 September 2001 was the work of Islamic terrorists. And apparently a majority ofThe masses have, over time, and have accepted the extra explanations in the "9 offered / 11 Commission Report." But the short-murder investigation that followed after the destruction of the WTC towers and the Pentagon bombing was living, was conscious and deadly, the obvious shortcomings of the U.S. government intervention. The crime scenes in New York and the Pentagon, were raped and fatally tainted by the destruction of physical evidence, witnesses were intimidated byFederal agents and a federal action against the Bush administration by an attorney in San Francisco, Stanley R. Hilton, who was brought over 160 9 / Families 11 victims, not dismissed by Federal Judge Susan Illston of the lack of credible evidence, the Hilton had on the court, but on the grounds of sovereign immunity that the President and his subordinates are not required by law. Again, the U.S. government to the masses was explained convincingly that 9 11 /the result of terrorism by militant Islamic extremists. But it is difficult credible evidence for those who read and research about the "9 / 11 Commission Report" that the U.S. government will probably planned and executed the events that occurred in September 2001, arranged by, perhaps, a foreign intelligence service (Pakistan?) for the Muslims, which they allegedly captured and tortured to confess that they were responsible. In 2004, about 80 percent of the American public(that is, those who supposedly answer to a telephone survey Harris) allegedly stated that they believed that the U.S. government had any interest in 9 / 11. Today, there are, according to several blogging sites for more than five million citizens who are convinced that beyond doubt that the U.S. government was involved in the elaborate planning and execution of 9 / 11. This state of mind, however, is to believe, against the morals of a people who are not willing that theirGovernment would commit such horrendous crimes against humanity for their economic and political goals. Nevertheless, the main product of the events of 9 / 11 was a national fear from an amorphous entity called Islamic terrorism. The same kind of fear seized shut the nation when the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, all Japanese-Americans were, and deprived of their liberty. The same fear of the Jews by the German people were trained by his evil propaganda of Hitlerand his henchmen. Over a period of years, the good relations deteriorated, the German Jews with the Christian Germans because the Germans were Christians over the years by government propaganda convinced that the Jews were a sub-human.
Idealism loses its attractiveness and value of the glaring light of pragmatism, because human justice and equity is not as lucrative for business purposes, such as practical tools for a capital gain through illusion and delusion. The UnitedStates is a culturally diverse nation of more than 300 million people, supposedly, 15-20 million people who are in the country illegally. With all of its demographic differences, the United States is perhaps the most racially and ethnically diverse nation in existence on the earth, from a variety of minority cultures, beliefs, religions and political beliefs. Racial, ethnic and religious homogeneity, like what it is, for example, predominantly in the nationFinland, and is structurally suited to a very united economic, social and political consensus. Therefore, Finland is a practical democratic socialist idealism, who enjoys every aspect of Finnish life that permeates from employment, medical care, to education. The Finnish people are generally in agreement, as most collective spirit, with a common goal of every citizen OFFER improve the quality of life and liberty. In a nutshell, economic and political pragmatism in a constructedMachiavellian scheme are more efficient in a large heterogeneous population carried out by people because it's pretty difficult to come to a majority of such people together to oppose it and seek a common objective. While rehearsing interactions between political parties and wealthy politicians appear in public in the U.S., according to an interactive program to define the status quo, various segments of the population with different political agendas, advocacy, strategic planningoccurs behind closed doors, the company accelerate plans (the Federal Reserve Board, Council on Foreign Relations, the Tri-Lateral Commission) for the benefit of the very rich. The current economic stratum of the United States corporate capitalist hierarchy is entirely political in nature. The laws and machinery for the expansion of capitalism in America who have benefited from the recent U.S. Congress and established a quasi-constitutional executive orders without the consent of the voting agePopulation of Americans, are the means by which the rich and the poor get poorer. Capitalism is essentially due to human greed and the practical expression of the mighty empires predicated by pragmatism.
There seems to be so is not, however, is an illusion. It is a kind of like a mirage in the barren waterless desert, where a person wants to die of thirst so bad that the less thirsty person believed by him in his assertion that a pool of refreshing cool water over the liesnext sand dune. The person will die of thirst to see what it considers to be water, we will now be in a hurry, and the sand will not tell the difference to drink. Perhaps another example of the illusion would be to dig a little boy in the big room full of horse manure like to say: "There's got to be pony here somewhere," In a time lost in the more than 600,000 American jobs every month, the Federal Bureau of Labor Statistics states on its website that "with more than 1.8 million civilian employees,Federal Government, with the exception of the Postal Service, the nation's largest employers. "At this degraded site, the number of employees in the federal and pointing to his function, indicated that 9 out of 10 of these workers from their residence in the Washington DC metropolitan area. What does not show it, is unrealistic for practical purposes, that about 5 of 10 of these workers with foreign nationality, visas, have been allowed to enter the country to the takeoverPlace of eligible American workers. The Government of the United States refers to the stranger as "the best and brightest" of a global labor market. Some of these workers, most part of the executive branch agencies staffed in the United States for more than 20 years of employment with complete certainty that has been the employment of the many graduates throughout the United States had. About 40,000 of these foreigners are allowed into the U.S. each year to take federal jobs andCorporate jobs supported by the federal government contract that could be easily adopted by American citizens. I personally know such a service has foreign nationals from Eastern Europe, which has been entering into the United States on a visa and working as a supervisor in a Washington DC based Veterans Organization, the U.S. Marine Corps veteran before the Board of Veterans Appeals . He has in the U.S. for more than ten years, but not yet attained citizenship, for some reason. He iscertainly a bold man to believe that he has a right to a job that was preferable to U.S. citizens would be served by perhaps one of the Marine Corps, currently 150,000 unemployed veterans displayed. This illusion promulgated by the U.S. government that she does everything to encourage employment in the country, when in fact, committed the Republic's largest employer and more than 10,000 foreign nations every quarter, is the practicality of pragmatism.
I remember my second re-readingby David Halberstam's book "The best and brightest" that get to the Kennedy era and the young president, to the helm of the U.S. government told a group formed by well-trained U.S. citizens in the best American universities, for the purpose promoting American interests for the benefit of the American republic, not a global economy. The machinery of the military-industrial complex, have been maintaining multi-national capitalism, intact in the 1960s. They wereplaced in strategic eco-political position through Congress legislation and regulations over many decades for the purpose of eventually creating what George HW Bush, the son of Nazi sympathizers, Prescott Bush, called the new world order. I do not know if the rich and wealthy John F. Kennedy was inaugurated, this mysterious plan for a global economy. Maybe he does not have to know first, but came to realize shortly after his election, he was that such a case. Perhaps he hasOppose them, and that's what killed him. Many people, including film producer Oliver Stone, believe that New Orleans District Attorney Jim Garrison in the pursuit of U.S. government executive as responsible for the assassination of President Kennedy was right. He stared well-made film, Kevin Costner, seemed to confirm this. Perhaps Kennedy was an idealist, but a pragmatist who saw the evils of global economic and political hierarchy, and wanted theUnited States to a sovereign position for the benefit of every American man holding a woman and child, regardless of the socio-economic level
Very few U.S. citizens know that the original plan was constitutional Congress' control over the shaping and evaluation of money from the Federal Reserve System to replace in 1913, between wealthy wealthy financiers and bankers in 1910 at a plush resort on the coast of Georgia hatched Jekyll Iceland called. The explicit aim of the meeting was the birth ofBanking cartel to protect its members from competition, and produce a strategy for convincing Congress and the public that this cartel was an agency of the U.S. federal government. The author, G. Edward Griffin produced, has a well-researched book on this event and footnotes very secretive in American history, entitled "The Creature from Jekyll Iceland" who should be reading every American citizen. This work concise non-fiction specifies clearly the power of money in a political, economicSystem was predicated on pragmatic capitalism. U.S. senators and representatives usually listen very closely, and cooperate fully with wealthy people who are willing to proclaim their origin in national politics and their reelection finance, especially banks and financiers. For example, when citizens speak briefly on their senators to ask, by phone, office staff always tell them that the senators are very busy, even if at this time, Senatorsare at home, doing fitness training at a congress plush spa, or simply nothing.
Decided a few years ago to find an independent investigative journalist, in order, as expected, a wealth affects the relationship with a U.S. senator or representative. So he called in Washington, DC office of a junior senator in a particular state and told the young employee who answered the call that he just come into possession of a lot of money and wanted to donate half of it to the Senatorre-election campaign. The only condition was that he wanted to speak with the senator before, and ask him some questions about the economy. The employee excitement of the reporters at the fixed point and would have told him that they do what they could. An hour later, the reporter received a phone call directly from the senator, who threatened to sue after learning of the fact that the invitation was only in the interest of journalistic research, and that his answer has been found, and to bring chargesagainst the reporter. To quell the trouncing epithet-Chunk senator, the reporter said was that he would turn the volume of incriminating words of the senator on the CBS News if the good senator does not pursue legal action against him. Even if nothing more threatening in that particular Senator was heard, this event paved the way for almost all federal politicians investigation and screening, telephone accounts of allegedly prosperous citizens, calls before returning. It was foundTruth about the influences, such as wealth and more often than not, controls the practices of elected politicians but, unfortunately, these buyers of power made more aware that their ruthless cunning affected under the scrutiny of some citizens.
In the second part of this essay I will engage a working model of democratic socialism, which would replace virtually global capitalism in the United States.
No comments:
Post a Comment