The majority of school shootings have taken while William Jefferson Blythe Clinton and George W. Bush 's reign. Just forty of forty-two shootings. Since its founding, America has always had guns and schools together in about the same time. But surprisingly forty photographs have taken on during its Presidency! Consider also that this was forty photographs at a time when the number of gun laws and restrictions increased! At least during the Clinton --Regime. Moreover, it is of course obvious that no one ever cared more about ending the violence in school and taking away weapons, then have this president. Also has anyone else was harder than they have in that direction.
Note that I even intentional shootings, not accidental gun discharges. I'm also not always the incidents of the massacre, which (like the use of a car in California in 1999) or any other type of instrument. The list of school shootings during the reign of Clintonreads as follows:
9. February 1992. Stockton, Calif., high school, 2 dead.
1. May 1992. Brooklyn, New York, high school, 4 dead, wounded 9th
12. January 1993. Miami, Florida, high school, 1 dead.
18. January 1993. Grayson, Ky., high school, 2 dead.
25. March 1993. St. Louis, Missouri, High School, 1 injured.
24. May 1993. Pennsburg, Pa., high school, 1 dead.
8. April 1994. Maryland High School, 1 injured.
2. February 1996.Moses Lake, Washington Junior High School, 3 dead, wounded, 1st
April 15.1996. Washington, District of Columbia High School, 1 injured.
19. February 1997. Bethel, Alaska, high school, 2 dead, wounded, 2nd
1. May 1997. New York, New York, High School, 1 injured.
1. October 1997. Pearl, Mississippi, High School, 2 dead, wounded 7th
1. December 1997. West Peducah, Ky., High School, 3 dead, wounded, 5th
15. December 1997. Stamps, Arkansas, 2wounded.
24. March 1998. Jonesboro, Ark., middle school, 5 killed, 10 injured.
24. April 1998. Edinboro, Pennsylvania, middle school, 1 dead.
28. April 1998. Pomona, California, elementary school, 2 dead, wounded, 1st
19. May 1998. Fayetteville, Tenn., high school, 1 dead.
21. May 1998. Springfield, Oregon, high school, 2 dead.
15. June 1998. Richmond, Virginia, high school, 2 wounded.
20. April 1999. Littleton, Colo., High School, 15 Dead, 28wounded.
20. May 1999. Conyers, Georgia, high school, 6 wounded.
19. November 1999. Deming, New Mexico, middle school, 1 dead.
6. December 1999. Fort Gibson, Oklahoma, middle school, 4 injured.
29. February 2000. Mount Morris Township, Mich., elementary school, 1 dead.
26. May 2000. Lake Worth, Fla., middle school, 1 dead.
26. September 2000. New Orleans, Carter G. Woodson Middle School, 2 wounded.
28. August 2000.Fayetteville, Arkansas, University of Arkansas, 2 dead.
Thus, the "body count" is during the war, Clinton's America is fifty-one dead and wounded eighty three.
The list of school shootings before and after Clinton are as follows:
1. August 1966. Austin, Texas, university, 14 dead.
12. July 1976. Fullerton, California, University, 7 killed, wounded, 2nd
5. March 2001. Santee, California, high school, 2 dead 13 wounded.
7. March 2001. Williamsport, Pennsylvania, High School, 1wounded.
22. March 2001. El Cajon, California, High School, 5 wounded.
30. March 2001. Gary, Indiana, high school, 1 dead.
15. January 2002. New York, New York, 2 wounded.
16. January 2002. Grungy, Virginia Law School, 3 dead, wounded, 3rd
2003, Case Western Reserve University Law School, 1 dead, wounded, 2nd
10. January 2003, Orlando, Fla., middle school, 1 dead.
September 2003, Cold Spring, MN, High School, 2 dead.
21. March 2005,Bemidji, MN, high school, 10 dead, 15 injured.
20. October 2005, Saginaw, MI, High School, 1 injured.
8. November 2005, Jacksboro, TN, high school, 1 dead, wounded, 2nd
The "Body Count" for all non-Clinton School shootings is forty-two dead and wounded thirty-six.
What is the explanation for the fact that have 96 percent of school shootings during Clinton made (aka Bubba) and George W. Bush 's (aka Dubya) presidency? Let us now consider some possibleStatements. As mentioned earlier, these photographs taken during a period when there was an increase in the number of federal and state laws restrict or eliminate gun ownership. In other words, in advance of the Clinton era, there was not enough gun laws. But in the same wild west front of the Clinton era, there were only two school shootings!
That is, during the 215 years is (from 1776 to 1991) of American history, guns easily accessible to our children. One couldeven say that (the former president in particular the evil Republicans) are not enough to care for our children. So, why is it that in advance of the Clinton era, filled with ruthless President and loose gun laws, there were only two school shootings? Hmmm? Obviously, the explanation for the increase in shootings while Bubba and Dubya-time is not the lack of gun laws.
Is the explanation to be found in the prevalence of drugs? This may not be right, because drugs were readilyavailable and are largely in the 1960s and 1970s. Just ask Clinton. Drugs, whether they are used legally or illegally in America for a long time. Plus, if you expect to alcohol as a drug, then certainly in the last America's regulated, if the availability was not as strong and surging social morality of the use, there were a whole series of school shootings have been. However, there was not.
The one before Clinton School shootings took place in August 1966 in Austin, Texas, andin July 1976 in Fullerton, California. The decade of the 1980s after the liberal media, was the decade of greed. A decade ago, when the rich get richer and the poor poorer. The decade of the Reagan and trickle economy. So, why was not there then no school shootings? Consider well that in the 1990s, there were more Americans investing in the stock market than ever before. Plus, the amount of cash that it is in the stock market is greater than ever before. W hy wouldthem this kind of investment? If the 1980s were the decade of greed, then why not the 1990's because of the above? Why are not there the 1990s as a decade of extreme greed?
So let us now to discuss a possible explanation that the cause of school shootings in the Clinton era for most of the 1990s () was due to the greed. If this explanation were correct, then we must ask what quantum of greed, was necessary for only two school shootings in front of his presidential cause?First, how much more hunger in America had lead present during the Clinton presidency to twenty-eight school shootings? How much greed in America is currently as a direct result of Dubya? Why was there such an enormous increase of greed during the Clinton presidency than all other presidents combined? Plus, why the greed factor go down in 1995? That was the only year of his presidency, in which there was no school shootings.
Besides, how could possibly the greedStatement since the 1990s, not a decade of greed? If it (a decade of greed, even if the media and the Democrats do not claim it to be), then why in the world would the U.S. government encouraging Americans to invest in the stock market? Why is the Congress of the United States should be taking into account so that Americans invest a portion of their pension funds in the stock market? What do we mean by saying that greed could be the explanation for the shootings in schools? Have wesaying that the shooters were greedy? Or that the victims were greedy? Who was greedy? Was it then-President? Who was it? Sure, it's important to know.
Plus, how much greed was necessary to initiate the shootings in schools? Are we to believe that if a certain person or persons who carry a certain amount of greed, then to ensure that school children will take up arms and shoot people at school? Greed is therefore not the cause of the shootings in schools. Not in theSense of a bottom-line statement. It should be clear that all the shooters were about something, greedy at some point in their lives. Some of them were motivated to some degree by greed during their executions. All men and women, boys and girls are equally subjected greedy. Greed alone can not explain why 96 percent of the shootings happened in schools and during Bubba Dubya presidency compared statistically spread in the majority of the remainingPresidents conditions.
Could we in the statement that our schools in Bubba and Dubya's words are insecure or unsure? If that were true then we would be a finding that has been in the first and Bubba Dubya years, as safe or safer schools that only two shots. S o how the schools were different back then? Simple-time schools do not have metal detectors, mandatory uniform, zero-tolerance policy, the classes became larger, there were not that many gun control lawsas now, and there was better access to weapons. In addition, some thirty years ago was a regular prayers, said in the class, like the promise of fidelity, and classes were still taught in English. Hmmm, I do not know how we think the answer, do we? Okay, then we will drop this possible explanation.
I wish that the offer is only primary explanation that Satan caused these tragic events. This is the right moment for him to act. In view of the above examples of actions Bubba'sthe sinful nature in my book Savior Clinton, it is obvious that he belongs to the devil. "Those who sin, does what is the devil because the devil has sinned from the beginning .... ie, how do we know who are the children of God and who are the children of the devil: If you do not do what is right was not a child of God "(1. John 3:8, 10). Christ said the devil, "The thief comes only to steal and kill and destroy" (John 10:10).
All men are born in sin, andMembers of the tribe of Satan, so to speak. To put it differently, they have the membership or membership or citizenship in the kingdom of darkness. The Apostle Paul wrote in his letter to the church in Rome (Romans 3:10 18) for this situation: "There is no righteous, not even one, there is no one who understands, no one who seeks God. All have turned away they together have no value, there is no one who does good, not even one. Their throat is an open grave, and their tongues to deceive.The poison of vipers is on their lips. Their mouths are full of cursing and bitterness. Her feet hasten to shed blood, ruin and misery mark their ways, and the way of peace they do not know. There is no fear of God before their eyes. "
So where does fit Dubya? Easy. The Bible says, "But now I am writing you that you do not need to assign who calls himself a brother but is sexually immoral or greedy, an idolater or a slanderer, a drunkard or a swindler. With such aMan does not eat. "1 Cor. 5.11. Dubya has worked from day one, concerned with protecting and the spirit of the Antichrist, in honor of Bubba. Please note that on the day of Dubya's first inauguration, when a boat load of evidence that the Clintons and equals defaced, destroyed and stole property from the White House, Dubya firmly put his foot down to ensure there was only a semblance of an investigation into these acts. And no one was ever convicted for such acts.
Continuing onduring the presidency of Dubya, we find that he and his father have grown closer and closer to Bubba and his wife. Numerous articles have been written about this budding romance. See, for example, upset the following articles, (1) Conservatives on Bush-Clinton Loveless, 15 June 2004 Newsman article, (2) Presidents: Bubba and Dubya-Warming Up, 8 January 2005, MSNBC article, (3) Clinton, Bush in the Super Bowl tsunami Grid 27 January 2005, Newsman article, (4) Bush Picks Brains of Clinton,Father, 9 April 2005, Washington Times, (5) The President shall make Bush and Clinton in Hurricane Relief Effort, 1 September 2005, The White House press release.
Obviously, God said to do with such a brother as a quotation above have to do. Bubba fills sure that description. More is sure to both Bush's blatantly violates the Word of God. I know in the defense of such a sin to tell many that I do not understand this or do that. Or that I am wrong. Dubya has even said that inthat only Bubba had his life to understand, since they both presidents. What this is really saying is that since we are both sinners and we share the same job description (or life experience, or had the same women, robbed, or the same persons, et cetera), it is only natural and useful that we dinner together. We have fellowship together. But God said to do nothing to sinners have. Not even a dinner with him or her. It seems to me we need toto conclude that God is wrong. The 2nd Corinthians was inspired, but empty verbal vomit (IV3 or cubed). The marrow is all polluted.
However, the reality is that by living the life they have these two men alone, the possibility provided for 96% of all shootings in schools to make available in America. Some say that is despite that Satan came to steal, kill and destroy, this is absurd statistic meaningless. All those who are killed or wounded, and destroyed their families, onlyto be "is comforted, and with their loss, as we said, these two men trust? How about agreeing with the Word of God? Especially after he has the destruction of the disobedience of Bubba and Dubya America caused.
It is the citizens of the kingdom of darkness, are expected to show continued as the fruits of the sinful nature in Galatians 5 above. This was mentioned by the Apostle John in 1 John 3:9. He is said: "No one who is born of Godcontinue to sin, because God's seed remains in him, he can not sin because he is born of God. "It is clear by examining the actions referred to by Bubba before in my book, reaches the only result is that he belongs to Satan. He's still a citizen of the kingdom of Satan.
Clinton enjoys incredible grace with the devil. It can be said that so far as regards the United States, he is the devil's number one. As president, he was indeed symbolic and the leader of theAmerica. While he led America into a certain direction, the devil came back and let these shootings take place. So why now? Why was this the time for the devil to 67 percent of school shootings in the U.S. during the reign of Bubba's cause? And 96% of them while Bubba and Dubya presidency. That is the question, my friend. That is the question that must be answered, so that appropriate action can be taken.
Let us consider another element oftouted Clinton's legacy. This is followed by the extraordinary increase in "hate" Web sites such as the Simon Wiesenthal Center. According to them, the number of hate sites that was before the bombing in Oklahoma City is only four. He then rose to over 2500! Of course, we must ask ourselves why the sudden increase after this act of international terrorism. You will recall that the bombing of Oklahoma City on 15 April 1995 happened. That was during the first term of Clinton. This year also was the only oneYears in which no school shootings took place during his reign. The Oklahoma bombing killed 168 Americans. Although Americans have killed other Americans from the outset, this was the time of the first and greatest act of international terrorism in the modern century.
We know that recorded after Jesus (as in the Book of John Chapter 8.44 and 10.10 clock), Satan, "... was not a murder from the outset in possession of the truth, because there is no truth in him" and "The thief occurs only onto steal kill and destroy. "Could the twenty-eight school shootings have taken place during time when President Clinton, by chance, or was it rather that would be during his reign, the time was ripe for Satan to come and kill 219 people and about 100 others when these two drugs alone? What are the possible reasons for the explosive growth of hate sites on the Internet? Is it the fault of Gore, who claimed he invented the Internet, why should the incredible lightnessOpinions and stories about the Internet to raise such a huge number of hate sites since 1995? Could it be that people suddenly hate all went online in 1995?
This is not a likely explanation, then what other reason could there be? If all the haters suddenly pay people to spread their message via the Internet? Was it all a part of a grand conspiracy to hate-mongering? Left, Center, or in the middle, take your choice. If so, where evidence of such support isExplanation? Also, why did the pop-up sites after the Oklahoma bombing? If this was all part of a well-orchestrated stunt by Attorney General Janet Reno to discredit the Internet and to show a reason for being regulated, licensed and taxed by the federal government?
One thing is certain: it is easy to show that testify to the continuous actions and words of Clinton and his government that they are citizens kingdom of Satan. Therefore, it should notsurprising that Satan is the man at the time used in the office, bringing death and destruction across America. And has embraced him as Dubya has sinful and deadly. This result should expect as much as the Americans, the daily rising of the sun in the east.
Scripture taken from the Bible, New International Version, ® Copyright © 1973, 1984 International Bible Society. Used by permission of Zondervan Publishing House.
No comments:
Post a Comment