. The Court said "NO," because in order to make that defense work, he had to prove, among other things, that 1)the "waver" did indeed make the signal 2)that the "waver" intended to convey that he had checked for traffic, and 3)that the "waver" intended to show that it was entirely safe to cross the street. These things are almost impossible to prove, so be careful out there. This is attorney Greg DiLeo, and this has been Your Legal Minute. ... Greg DiLeo Personal Injury Louisiana Lawyer New ...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IvH0LGWF1Ag&hl=en
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment